Comparison
Most AI assistants ingest none of your writing to build a style — they read a description you type — so the practical comparison is between tools that accept a writing sample and tools that accept only instructions.
The question how many samples does it need assumes every tool takes samples. Most do not. Asking the question exposes the split: instructions-only personalisation on one side, sample-based on the other, and corpus-based measurement on a third.
The distinction has a consequence people feel later. Instructions-only personalisation cannot get more accurate as you write more, because writing more does not change the instruction. Corpus-based profiles improve as coverage grows.
| Tool | Input it accepts for style | Improves as you write more? | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT custom instructions | Text you write describing your preferences | No | Vendor settings UI |
| ChatGPT Projects | Project instructions plus uploaded reference files | Only if you re-upload | Vendor product docs |
| Claude custom Styles | Uploaded sample content reflecting how you communicate | Only if you re-upload | anthropic.com/news/styles |
| Claude Projects | Custom instructions plus a knowledge base of files | Only if you re-upload | anthropic.com/news/projects |
| Gemini Gems | Instructions you write, plus files for context | No | support.google.com/gemini |
| MyWritingTwin | A corpus of your own writing; free tier from 2,000 words for one use case | Yes — coverage per audience, medium and language | mywritingtwin.com/pricing |
Cite this page
MyWritingTwin. “How much of your writing each AI tool actually ingests.” Last updated 2026-09-15. https://www.mywritingtwin.com/reference/how-much-writing-each-tool-ingests